It’s hard not to feel like an overzealous dermatologist examining the subjects of Richard Learoyd’s exhibition at Fraenkel Gallery. His large-scale direct-positive images reveal a degree of epidermal detail one usually only gets to see while making out under an interrogation lamp. The shallow depth of field that marks Learoyd’s portraits and that shows imperfections with pitiless clarity—a rough patch here, an incipient pimple there, weirdly dilated pupils—somewhat mitigates the monumental quality lent them by the size of the images and the solid, sometimes brilliant hues he clothes his models in (when he clothes them).
- ART (123)
- EVENTS (30)
- PERSONAL ESSAYS (61)
- publishing (21)
- Publishing rants (11)
- REVIEWS (78)
- San Francisco (89)
Arts writing doesn’t pay much.
- RT @kylegriffin1: Oh boy. The new cover of @DerSPIEGEL https://t.co/pt8Qk5uwOP 1 day ago
- RT @KagroX: The "billionaire" who wants to build a wall so Mexicans won't steal your job now wants to cancel your health insurance to pay f… 1 day ago
- RT @DanteAtkins: Wonder how many Trump supporters wearing bald eagle shirts realize the EPA is why the bald eagle isn't extinct. 1 day ago
- RT @Travon: Serena Williams won a grand slam while she was pregnant so every man should probably shut up about everything forever. 4 days ago
- RT @ShaunKing: 17 women have accused Donald Trump of what O'Reilly is about to be fired for. And we have a recording of Trump admitting he… 4 days ago
- 42,383 hits