It’s hard not to feel like an overzealous dermatologist examining the subjects of Richard Learoyd’s exhibition at Fraenkel Gallery. His large-scale direct-positive images reveal a degree of epidermal detail one usually only gets to see while making out under an interrogation lamp. The shallow depth of field that marks Learoyd’s portraits and that shows imperfections with pitiless clarity—a rough patch here, an incipient pimple there, weirdly dilated pupils—somewhat mitigates the monumental quality lent them by the size of the images and the solid, sometimes brilliant hues he clothes his models in (when he clothes them).
- ART (123)
- EVENTS (30)
- PERSONAL ESSAYS (61)
- publishing (21)
- Publishing rants (11)
- REVIEWS (78)
- San Francisco (89)
Arts writing doesn’t pay much.
- RT @langston_poems: If I am too much for you, you must not have me. 13 hours ago
- Jerry Saltz Has a Pulitzer and I Have Questions observer.com/2018/04/jerry-… 5 days ago
- Thanks, YIMBYs. "Ten percent of buildings will collapse,.....I don’t understand why that’s acceptable.” San Francis… twitter.com/i/web/status/9… 5 days ago
- RT @thistallawkgirl: Who better to solve 1,300 years of Middle East turmoil than a man who’s been at war with Rosie O'Donnell for 12 years… 6 days ago
- Desmoiselles d'Avignon is not a painting of an orgy, you philistines. Cosby, Weinstein, Trump, Spacey orgy painting… twitter.com/i/web/status/9… 6 days ago
- 45,336 hits