It’s hard not to feel like an overzealous dermatologist examining the subjects of Richard Learoyd’s exhibition at Fraenkel Gallery. His large-scale direct-positive images reveal a degree of epidermal detail one usually only gets to see while making out under an interrogation lamp. The shallow depth of field that marks Learoyd’s portraits and that shows imperfections with pitiless clarity—a rough patch here, an incipient pimple there, weirdly dilated pupils—somewhat mitigates the monumental quality lent them by the size of the images and the solid, sometimes brilliant hues he clothes his models in (when he clothes them).
- ART (123)
- EVENTS (30)
- PERSONAL ESSAYS (61)
- publishing (21)
- Publishing rants (11)
- REVIEWS (78)
- San Francisco (89)
Arts writing doesn’t pay much.
- RT @hondanhon: Twelve. Twelve out of nearly 300. twitter.com/juddlegum/stat… 16 hours ago
- RT @theyearofelan: Sure, the cancer was aggressive. But the chemotherapy was also very aggressive. There was aggression on both sides 1 day ago
- RT @langston_poems: I believe it to be true, You see, Tomorrow Now belongs to me - 1 day ago
- RT @3DennisCarlins: Only this country would be fucking stupid enough to start a civil war over statues from the last civil war. 1 day ago
- RT @Limericking: Congrats to today’s GOP On backing a fine nominee, Now busy befriending The Nazis defending Confederate Robert E. Lee. 1 day ago
- 43,260 hits