It’s hard not to feel like an overzealous dermatologist examining the subjects of Richard Learoyd’s exhibition at Fraenkel Gallery. His large-scale direct-positive images reveal a degree of epidermal detail one usually only gets to see while making out under an interrogation lamp. The shallow depth of field that marks Learoyd’s portraits and that shows imperfections with pitiless clarity—a rough patch here, an incipient pimple there, weirdly dilated pupils—somewhat mitigates the monumental quality lent them by the size of the images and the solid, sometimes brilliant hues he clothes his models in (when he clothes them).
- ART (123)
- EVENTS (30)
- PERSONAL ESSAYS (61)
- publishing (21)
- Publishing rants (11)
- REVIEWS (78)
- San Francisco (89)
Arts writing doesn’t pay much.
- RT @itssylviaplath: There is a charge for the eyeing of my scars, there is a charge for the hearing of my heart. 1 day ago
- I'm sure this is *something cultural appropriation something blah blah* but as usual I love it: Wafrica's Kimonos konbini.com/ng/lifestyle/w… 1 day ago
- Punk's not dead. Does an Offensive Fart Deserve a $1,000 Fine? citylab.com/equity/2017/10… 2 days ago
- RT @WendyMolyneux: MAN IS ACTUAL SEXUAL PREDATOR: these are just rumors let's wait and see WOMAN IS NOMINATED FOR PRESIDENT: she is defi… 1 week ago
- I think I'm ready for us to be wiped off the face of the planet now. Cockroach milk: the protein drink amp.cnn.com/cnn/2016/07/27… 1 week ago
- 43,656 hits